FA chairman threatens to withdraw Arsenal, Chelsea and Tottenham from Europe
FA chairman Greg Clarke has threatened the top Premier League clubs with not being able to play in Europe should they form a breakaway league, according to football.london.
In a letter to FA Council members, Clarke has addressed the fall-out from the Liverpool-backed Project Big Picture, which seeks to put more finances into the EFL in exchange for handing the nine longest-serving Premier League clubs the exclusive power to make decisions on matters in the top tier.
The plans were backed by EFL chairman and former Reds CEO Rick Parry, who it was reported had offered the big six a place in a breakaway EFL league should the proposals not go through.
In response, Clarke has reminded the clubs that the FA have the power to veto any regulatory changes in the Premier League – and hinted that any side forming a breakaway league would not be nominated for European competition.
Confirming his early involvement in the talks before he realised clubs wanted to concentrate power, Clarke argued that the FA would be more willing to listen to a collaborative change in football.
He said: “We will always have conversations with stakeholders at both a national and international level to understand any changes to the landscape that could impact our structure and listen to ideas that are put forward.
“However, we would only offer formal support for any proposal when it goes through the proper channels and has a full evaluation.
“With the knowledge of senior board members and our CEO, I participated in the early stages of discussions which were disclosed last weekend.
“It is very important stakeholders discuss resolving some of the strategic issues facing our game such as, for example, fixture congestion.
“However, in late spring, when the principal aim of these discussions became the concentration of power and wealth in the hands of a few clubs with a breakaway league mooted as a threat, I of course, discontinued my involvement and counselled a more consensus-based approach involving all Premier League clubs and its Chair and CEO.
“Our game needs to continually seek to improve but benefits need to be shared.
“We, the FA Board and council, have to ensure that any changes would be to the long-term benefit of the whole of football and we have substantial controls to help ensure that the best interests of the game are served by any new proposals.”
He added: “In addition, to the Special Share in the Premier League, which prevents certain changes being made to the constitution without the FA’s consent, it is also the FA’s responsibility to sanction competitions in England – including any proposed new competition – as well as being responsible for licensing clubs, through UEFA, to play in Europe.
“Additionally, UEFA look to us to nominate the league, and therefore the clubs, that will play in their competitions.”
Clarke also called for clubs to work together to plan a brighter future for the game in England.
He wrote: “English football is the world’s most watched, and has a vibrant, dynamic and competitive league structure that drives interest around the globe.
“To maintain this position, it is important that we all work together. Both the Premier League and the FA support a wide-ranging discussion on the future of the game, including its competition structures, calendar and overall financing, particularly in light of the effects of COVID-19.
“Our perspective is that we have a fantastic league structure and pyramid that is the envy of the world. While we should always be open to evolve, to move the game forwards, changes have to be done in the right way and with a long-term perspective in mind.
“We are fully aware that there are huge financial pressures throughout the game and collectively we need to work hard so that our clubs survive the pandemic. However, we must separate this need from discussions about the potential long-term structure of our wonderful game.
“Of course, if we can agree changes that are beneficial in the long term and have an immediate positive impact, we will consider that. Equally, we cannot be forced into short term decisions that would be damaging in the long term.”